<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n Gigabit Router Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rk.md/2008/airport-extreme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rk.md/2008/airport-extreme/</link>
	<description>-- welcome to the life of a tech-savvy medical student --</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://rk.md/2008/airport-extreme/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rishi-kumar.com/?p=216#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>At the time I wrote this review, I was using Linux on my notebook (as well as a test box) and accessed the router via the wireless interface. I had no need to configure the router from Linux as I had it directly connected to a Windows box. Also, I mentioned that the Airport Utility could only run on Windows and OS X. I agree with your comments regarding the benefits of HTML configuration pages as seen with Cisco, Netgear, etc.; however, the Apple loyalists out there will always succumb to Cupertino&#039;s products, regardless of how ridiculous some of the &quot;features&quot; are. Thanks for your opinions though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time I wrote this review, I was using Linux on my notebook (as well as a test box) and accessed the router via the wireless interface. I had no need to configure the router from Linux as I had it directly connected to a Windows box. Also, I mentioned that the Airport Utility could only run on Windows and OS X. I agree with your comments regarding the benefits of HTML configuration pages as seen with Cisco, Netgear, etc.; however, the Apple loyalists out there will always succumb to Cupertino&#8217;s products, regardless of how ridiculous some of the &#8220;features&#8221; are. Thanks for your opinions though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://rk.md/2008/airport-extreme/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rishi-kumar.com/?p=216#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get this review - you say you use Linux and yet you praise the Airport utility for it&#039;s ease of use.
How easy is it to use when there&#039;s not a version for your OS?

There&#039;s a good reason why the others use html configuration utities.  You don&#039;t need to install anything and they work across all platforms.  This is just another case of Apple doing things their own way and assuming that you&#039;re using only their products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get this review &#8211; you say you use Linux and yet you praise the Airport utility for it&#8217;s ease of use.<br />
How easy is it to use when there&#8217;s not a version for your OS?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a good reason why the others use html configuration utities.  You don&#8217;t need to install anything and they work across all platforms.  This is just another case of Apple doing things their own way and assuming that you&#8217;re using only their products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
